In this article, Manfred Kets de Vries shares his wisdom on the art of CEO coaching. The coaching role, as described by one of my key coaching authorities, illustrates very well the approach and working alliance which I aspire to in my coaching practice.
Successful coaching involves working…
In this article, Richard Boyatzis, Melvin Smith and Ellen Van Oosten share their views on how a boss, a colleague, a friend or a spouse, introverted or extroverted, emotional or analytic, or high or low on the totem pole, can learn how to facilitate life-enhancing change in those around them.
This article presents case studies which are very consistent with the Continuous Performance Management framework I am promoting with my partner Clear Review. It also mentions the Deloitte report on 2017 HR trends: 95% of interviewed managers are dissatisfied with annual appraisals. 06%-70% employees consider this is a waste of time. 70% HR Managers consider it as ineffective.
Bientôt la fin de…
We promote a continuous performance management approach. However, Managers must be effective and relevant for this to work. This article from HBR is a good illustration of these difficulties and the reasons why change management and support for managers is critical to the success of such a process.
THE CHALLENGE
Managers today are bombarded with calls to give feedback - constantly,…
Benchmarking practices, through interviews of HR Directors from large French companies in 2011, ANACT, a French government agency, identified vigilance points and extended recommendations very much in line with the Continuous Performance Management approach I am promoting with my partner Clear Review.
Vigilance points mentioned by ANACT:
French business press regularly reports companies switching to Continuous Performance Management. The consulting firm, Mazars, is very much in line with the approach we used at Bain and the Continuous Performance Management framework I am promoting with my partner Clear Review. Note that Mazars is using Workday, which is not a dedicated continuous performance management tool: implementation is nevertheless bringing benefits.
This article by HBR shows that the implementation of a continuous management of the performance must be done with precaution. If appraisals are not providing value in terms of improving employee performance, it may be tempting to simply stop doing them and leave it at that. In fact some organisations. In practice, the Facebook example shows that, when you completely remove formal performance management processes,…
In this article, Manfred Kets de Vries warns us against marketing pitches from some executive coaches. Having worked with Manfred on a consulting asignment when I was with Bain and having also followed his teaching as a participant to the EMC program at INSEAD, I appreciate this humble wisdom from one of my key coaching authorities.
The advertising pitches of many coaches raise false expectations and seem designed to fool the gullible.
I find myself increasingly intimidated by people in the executive coaching world. They give me a sense of unease about my own abilities. Many in the profession claim to be able “to unlock clients’ dormant potential and to provide them with a sense of self-fulfillment”. As these coaches seem to have so much to offer, how can I reach the Olympian heights they profess to dwell in? With their amazing skills, they say they can “deepen their clients’ learning, improve their performance and enhance their quality of life, both personally and professionally”. It must be true because they present glowing testimonials of clients who, thanks to their life-changing interventions, have become phenomenal leaders.
Amidst the boom of executive coaches, there appears to be an even more elevated type of coach: the master coach. These remarkable professionals differentiate themselves from the pack by being “always on the lookout for the things their clients don’t want to see or don’t want to hear”. They are their clients’ early warning system, the very key to their self-actualisation. These coaches bring their clients to places they never thought they would be able to reach.
I must admit that these autobiographical descriptions of exceptionally qualified master coaches further harm my self-confidence. Do I have what it takes? But joining their lofty ranks seems to be an accounting game, requiring (according to the websites of some of these master coaches) between 2,500 to 10,000 hours of direct coaching experience. Another requirement is to regularly practise “self-coaching”, a process that can “allow your soul to emerge and be seen”. What this is all about remains somewhat puzzling to me. But as an executive coach myself, I would apparently be “more fulfilled” – and make “more money” – if I were to sign up for one of their training programmes.
But lo and behold, there exists a yet more select qualification: the most trusted advisor. Compared to run-of-the-mill executive coaches or master coaches, these most trusted advisors shine (or so they say) by being reliable, credible, personable, passionate, authentic and able to connect emotionally. And, if we believe their self-descriptions, they also provide their clients with an “Echo”, “Anchor”, “Mirror” and “Spark” function. Although many of these words puzzle me, I bow to these supermen and superwomen of the coaching world.
Of course, these executive coaches, master coaches and most trusted advisors have designed sophisticated frameworks to help them fight the good fight. Interestingly enough, in describing their schemes, they seem to have a preference for acronyms, all of them very catchy, such as FUEL, GROW, SMART, PURE and CLEAR.
Preventing coaching from becoming a fad
However, when I put on my “sceptic hat”, I wonder whether these distinctions between executive coach, master coach and most trusted advisor are somewhat of a marketing segmentation plot – a way to fool the gullible. Many of these descriptions sound to me more like psychobabble, language that is heavily reliant on psychological jargon and expressions. And based on my experience, the people who tend to resort to this kind of language often have little or no real training in psychology.
Referring to all these acronymic models, I would like to add that, to the best of my knowledge, the psychological dynamics that guide human behaviour are far from neat. Human behaviour doesn’t fit elegantly into boxes or categories. While these various acronyms may facilitate visual and verbal recognition, by excluding the subtle nuances of human dynamics, they easily turn into fads. Oversimplified models fail to build an understanding of what’s really happening in the coach-client interface.
Furthermore, I believe that the coaching profession isn’t doing itself any favours by exaggerating what it has to offer. Contrary to all the hype found in the literature of coaching training programmes, creating behaviour change isn’t easy, fast or linear. There are no miraculous cures in the helping professions. As any psychiatrist, psychoanalyst or clinical psychologist can tell you, behaviour change is hard work that comes with many setbacks. In most interventions, it’s two steps forward, one step back. Therefore, the exaggerated promises made by executive coaches, master coaches and most trusted advisors create highly unrealistic expectations.
Perhaps it’s fair to describe the offerings made by many of these coaches and coaching programmes as a somewhat questionable sales pitch. This lack of truth in advertising only debases the coaching profession. It’s high time to debunk the shallowness behind the proliferation of jargon and boastful claims in executive coaching. In its place, we need richer frameworks to define the kind of work coaches are capable off, as well as ways of assessing the quality of their coaching interventions.
The American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. once said: “A mind that is stretched by a new experience can never go back to its old dimensions.” Coaching as the language of change and learning has a salient role to play. However, while doing so, it must stay grounded and avoid turning into a fad.
Manfred Kets de Vries is the Distinguished Clinical Professor of Leadership Development & Organisational Change at INSEAD and the Raoul de Vitry d'Avaucourt Chaired Professor of Leadership Development, Emeritus. He is the Founder of INSEAD Global Leadership Centre and the Programme Director of The Challenge of Leadership, one of INSEAD’s top Executive Development Programmes.
Professor Kets de Vries is also the Scientific Director of the Executive Master in Change (EMC). His most recent books are: You Will Meet a Tall, Dark Stranger: Executive Coaching Challenges; Telling Fairy Tales in the Boardroom: How to Make Sure Your Organisation Lives Happily Ever After; and Riding the Leadership Rollercoaster: An Observer’s Guide.
In this article, Manfred Kets de Vries shares his wisdom on the art of CEO coaching. The coaching role, as described by one of my key coaching authorities, illustrates very well the approach and working alliance which I aspire to in my coaching practice.
Successful coaching involves working with – not against – an individual’s resistance.
“Knowing is the easy part; saying it out loud is the hard part.” – Nicholas Evans, The Horse Whisperer
The term “horse whisperer” was first associated with Daniel Sullivan, an Irish horse trainer who became famous for his ability to rehabilitate intractable horses more than 200 years ago. Today, it refers to those gifted with a deep understanding of equine psychology, enabling those who can “whisper” to elicit the horses’ cooperation.
Some coaches (and consultants) very much resemble horse whisperers. Instead of dealing with difficult horses, however, they whisper to CEOs. Their effectiveness is due to an intuitive understanding of what drives these executives. They know how to interpret their verbal and non-verbal language. Also, they recognise that many of these executives – despite their success or perhaps because of it – may have acquired dysfunctional behavioural patterns along the way.
Starting a working alliance
To be successful, CEO whisperers must first establish a working alliance with their clients and remember that the relationship unfolds in a specific context, never in a vacuum. Given both parties’ characteristics and peculiarities, some amount of fumbling can be expected along the way.
Listening skills are critical to the success of this working alliance. Deep, active listening will allow the CEO whisperer to decipher the client’s verbal and non-verbal cues throughout the relationship.
The first meeting is always the trickiest, as both parties try to determine if they can work together. If the potential client doesn’t feel engaged, there is very little chance that a working alliance will be established.
Furthermore, creating a working alliance is more difficult with clients who are overly defensive; who are extremely guarded or quiet; or who do not have any idea of what they want to get out of the intervention. The CEO also needs to be willing to engage in the change effort.
Defining a desired future
During the initial interview, I often ask questions to draw out the executive’s thoughts and wants, such as: What brought you to see me? What do you feel is wrong in your work and personal life? What are the issues you’d like to work on? What would you like to be different?
I tell them to imagine that they are looking into a crystal ball: What would they like to see in the future, especially as an outcome of our work together? Imagining a desired future creates a mindset focused on progress.
To better understand their inner drivers, I ask them to tell me something about their personal history, e.g. education, relationships or career trajectory. However, I refrain from prying into topics that may be sensitive, such as the person’s childhood. Clients should be able to decide if and when certain themes become part of the coaching relationship.
Don’t poke the bear (too soon)
To nudge clients along, it’s important to show a modicum of understanding about their predicament. Clients need to feel safe, accepted and respected. Coaching requires an open attitude, as well as warmth and empathy. Clients may hold very different values and beliefs, but a coach’s job is to help them achieve their objectives, whatever these may be. The last thing clients want is to be lectured to and feel controlled.
It is wise to play it safe in the beginning and to avoid any form of argument. Think of the working alliance as a form of judo. A judoka moves with resistance rather than fights it. It is of utmost importance that the coach be aware of what does and doesn’t work – and adjust accordingly. Based on my experience, progress can stall if clients are pressed to deal with issues that they are not yet ready to face. In coaching, it is best to strike when the iron is cold.
In addition, coaches should refrain from giving false assurances. As I’ve written before, there are no miraculous cures in the helping professions. Clients can indeed hope to improve their lives with coaching, but it is important not to create highly unrealistic expectations.
Touching on vulnerabilities
Serious CEO whispering also requires delving into uncomfortable and difficult aspects of the executive’s life. After a working alliance has been firmly established, I try to pique my clients’ curiosity by carefully starting to challenge them. When the situation warrants it, humour can be used to facilitate the dialogue.
At this stage, the coach must remain attuned to clients, generate curiosity and create the framework for the future relationship. One way to do so by encouraging clients to share details about their stressors, frustrations and dissatisfaction. This helps in formulating the goal component of the relationship.
While keeping these various concerns in mind, it is useful to enquire how the client feels about the working relationship. Do they feel safe, heard, taken seriously and cared for? Do they still hope for – and even expect – success?
An opportunity for self-reflection
To sum up, the role of a CEO whisperer is to help executives act out less and be more reflective. A CEO whisperer coaxes them to examine their lives and maximise their potential.
Socrates said that the unexamined life is not worth living: Too many people cruise through life without reflecting on their destination or purpose. These people are just moving in the dark. This is where CEO whisperers rise to the fore, helping their clients dispel the shadows and see things as they are, not how they wish they would be.
Manfred Kets de Vries is the Distinguished Clinical Professor of Leadership Development & Organisational Change at INSEAD and the Raoul de Vitry d'Avaucourt Chaired Professor of Leadership Development, Emeritus. He is the founder of INSEAD's Global Leadership Centre and the Programme Director of The Challenge of Leadership, one of INSEAD’s top Executive Education programmes.
Professor Kets de Vries's most recent books are: You Will Meet a Tall, Dark Stranger: Executive Coaching Challenges; Telling Fairy Tales in the Boardroom: How to Make Sure Your Organisation Lives Happily Ever After; and Riding the Leadership Rollercoaster: An Observer’s Guide. A new book will appear this year: Down the Rabbit Hole of Leadership: Leadership Pathology of Everyday Life.
In this article, Richard Boyatzis, Melvin Smith and Ellen Van Oosten share their views on how a boss, a colleague, a friend or a spouse, introverted or extroverted, emotional or analytic, or high or low on the totem pole, can learn how to facilitate life-enhancing change in those around them.
They make a strong point on the need to coach with compassion and relate to the theory of intentional change developed by Richard Boyatzis in 1970: intentional change involves envisioning the ideal self (who you wish to be and what you want to do in your work and life); exploring the real self (the gaps you need to fill and the strengths that will help you do so); developing a learning agenda (a road map for turning aspirations into reality); and then experimenting and practicing (with new behaviours and roles). Good coaches help people through this process.
Read more at Harvard Business Review Sep.-Oct. 2019.
Benchmarking practices, through interviews of HR Directors from large French companies in 2011, ANACT, a French government agency, identified vigilance points and extended recommendations very much in line with the Continuous Performance Management approach I am promoting with my partner Clear Review.
Vigilance points mentioned by ANACT:
Recommendations mentioned by ANACT:
Let us note that ANACT underlines the complexity of Continuous Performance Management implementation, using the example of a large audit/consulting firm where annual appraisals are partly fuelled by evaluations made by assignment managers through the year (6 to 8 per year per consultant). ANACT finds this approach interesting on paper but feeds back from employees the difficulties of harmonising evaluations in this context.
Download the article (in French): Entretien d'évaluation : L'Anact décrypte des pratiques de grandes entreprises.